Why does Delhi’s air remain polluted despite years of intervention?
AWE will follow the sources, the institutions responsible and the evidence needed to know whether an intervention worked.
AWE STORIES · 60s FIELD BRIEFS
Tap any circle to view vertical reelSPOTLIGHT INVESTIGATIONAIR · EVIDENCE DOSSIER6 MIN READ · 4K FOOTAGE
Why does Delhi’s air remain polluted despite years of intervention?
AWE will follow the sources, the institutions responsible and the evidence needed to know whether an intervention worked.
EVIDENCE STATUSConflicting & Insufficient
RESPONSIBLE BODIESCPCB · Delhi Govt · Municipal Corp
KEY QUESTIONSpending count vs measured drop
Trending Investigations
What India is trying.
What the evidence shows.
The scientists trying to understand what Delhi actually breathes
From emissions to exposure, the questions become more human when measurement leaves the dashboard and enters daily life.
200 sprinklers deployed. Did pollution actually fall?
Counting equipment is easy. Establishing environmental effect requires a different kind of evidence.
Can a neighbourhood handle waste without passing the problem elsewhere?
A replicable solution has to explain labour, cost, segregation, collection and what happens after the gate.
Your city’s AQI is 300. Does that mean your exposure is 300?
A public index, a pollutant concentration and a person’s exposure answer different questions.
Why do we still burn waste?
The visible flame is one moment in a longer chain of collection, incentives and responsibility.
Where does Gurugram’s water actually come from?
Follow the pipes, tankers, aquifers and public records behind a city’s daily water.
A treatment plant was commissioned. What reaches the river?
Capacity, operation and water quality are three separate pieces of evidence.
What happens after the garbage truck leaves?
A visual journey through collection, sorting, recovery, treatment and disposal—and the gaps between them.
AWE Shorts · 60s Field Briefs
High-impact dispatches.
Watch and verify on the go.
6
Did 200 smog guns reduce pollution? The ground sensor verdict.
We analyzed PM2.5 readings within 20m, 50m, and 200m of operating water mist cannons. Here is what the telemetry showed.
24.2k viewsWatch Brief ↗
How Bengaluru revived 18 dead lakes with zero chemicals.
Anand Malligavad’s bio-engineering method uses natural swales, gravity silt separators, and zero concrete.
38.6k viewsWatch Brief ↗
What really happens to sorted waste after the collection gate?
Tracing dry and wet waste streams from kitchen bins to ward-level composting and informal recycling cooperatives.
19.4k viewsWatch Brief ↗
AQI 300 vs your commute: Why city averages hide your peak exposure.
Rooftop sensor averages at 30 meters height underestimate sidewalk traffic exposure by up to 2.4x.
42.1k viewsWatch Brief ↗
The 5-question test that cuts through corporate greenwash in 60s.
Never confuse equipment spending with measurable ecological impact. Here is how AWE verifies claims.
15.8k viewsWatch Brief ↗
Why Delhi’s air stays toxic despite years of intervention.
Examining multiple municipal authorities, regional geography, and the missing enforcement paper trail.
31.5k viewsWatch Brief ↗
01 / The atmosphere we share
Air
Pollution, exposure, transport, industry, monitoring and the work of making clean air possible.
Enter Air ↗02 / Every source and flow
Water
Groundwater, rivers, sewage, drinking water, restoration and who depends on every drop.
Enter Water ↗03 / The living ground
Earth
Waste, soil, forests, biodiversity, materials and the consequences left behind.
Enter Earth ↗Solutions worth copying
What worked?
What did it take?
Can a neighbourhood handle waste without passing the problem elsewhere?
A replicable solution has to explain labour, cost, segregation, collection and what happens after the gate.
Can a restored lake stay restored?
The ribbon-cutting is one day. Hydrology, sewage control and maintenance decide what follows.
What the evidence says
A claim is a beginning.
Follow the thread.
How AWE works ↗200 sprinklers deployed. Did pollution actually fall?
Counting equipment is easy. Establishing environmental effect requires a different kind of evidence.
One water number. The context that keeps it honest.
J.K. Cement reported 3,235,683 kL of water consumption for FY2025–26. Here is what that figure can—and cannot—tell us.
AWE Conversations & Ground Dispatches
The subject is the hero.
Experts help us see it.
View all ↗Can we trust the air-quality numbers we see every day?
A proposed conversation about monitors, models, missing data and how public numbers should be interpreted.
Why do we still burn waste?
The visible flame is one moment in a longer chain of collection, incentives and responsibility.
One chart worth understanding
Environmental information
should be understandable.
View all ↗One water number. The context that keeps it honest.
J.K. Cement reported 3,235,683 kL of water consumption for FY2025–26. Here is what that figure can—and cannot—tell us.
Most read
Questions people
keep coming back to.
Something worth knowing is happening
Tell
AWE.
Tell us about a person, solution or environmental action we should investigate.
Submit a story ↗A distributed reporting network
Join
the work.
Students, researchers, photographers, engineers, journalists and citizens can help environmental evidence travel.
Become a contributor ↗About AWE